Symphony No. 5, Movement 4 - Full Score
Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device.
You can download and read online Symphony No. 5, Movement 4 - Full Score file PDF Book only if you are registered here.
And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Symphony No. 5, Movement 4 - Full Score book.
Happy reading Symphony No. 5, Movement 4 - Full Score Bookeveryone.
Download file Free Book PDF Symphony No. 5, Movement 4 - Full Score at Complete PDF Library.
This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats.
Here is The CompletePDF Book Library.
It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Symphony No. 5, Movement 4 - Full Score Pocket Guide.
However, in the development section, Beethoven systematically fragments and dismembers this heroic theme in bars — Thus he may have rescored its return in the recapitulation for a weaker sound to foreshadow the essential expositional closure in minor. Moreover, the horns used in the fourth movement are natural horns in C, which can easily play this passage.
However, the horns in E flat are playing immediately prior to this, so such a change would be rendered difficult if not impossible due to lack of time. Skip to main content. Classical Music. Search for:. Beethoven: Symphony No. Symphony No. Hear the Music. Performed by the Skidmore College Orchestra. Music courtesy of Musopen.
New York: Thames and Hudson. Citation in col. Bamberg, Retrieved 26 July Archived from the original on 22 December The Music of Berlioz. The Beethoven Companion. The Symphony. Beethoven: The Music and the Life. New York: W. The Classical Style 2nd ed.
New York: Norton. The Beethoven Journal 24 2 : 56— Leipzig: C. Beethoven as I Knew Him. London: Faber and Faber. As translated from Schindler Biographie von Ludwig van Beethoven. The Beethoven Compendium. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Borders Press. Classical Music Pages. Mason Gross School of Arts. New Haven: Yale University Press. Boston Classic Orchestra.
Symphony No. 5 by Ludwig van Beethoven/arr. Richa | J.W. Pepper Sheet Music
Archived from the original on 17 July Classical Notes. All About Beethoven. Grove Online Encyclopedia. Essays in Musical Analysis, Volume 1: Symphonies. London: Oxford University Press. Retrieved 28 April Ludwig van Beethoven: Symphony No. ISMN M British Academy Review. Retrieved 23 February Critical Commentary. New York: Dover Publications. The Low Bells simply articulate the low structural tones of the Extra Violin II part in its pattern of 5 sixteenth notes.
- New York Philharmonic | Scores > Shostakovich, Dmitri?
- the egg (Japanese Edition).
- My Persian Valentine.
- My account.
- Comprendre Kant (Lire et comprendre) (French Edition)!
It is essential here that a special set of Low Bells only the 4 pitches needed be placed near the Extra Violin II player so that the two players may coordinate the combined part. If the Extra Violin II part is being played onstage, there is time for the Bells player to walk to this set before this passage and then back to the main set afterwards. However, the upbeats of the Orchestra Piano are the downbeats of the BU, and vice-versa, so the player cannot simply look at the beat pattern of the BU conductor. It will be simplest for the Orchestra Piano player to extend the tempo of dotted quarter notes t.
In other words, the dotted quarter t. Alternatively, a rhythmic cue line showing the relationship of the beats of the Main Orchestra to the beats of the Orchestra Piano is provided in the full score and in the part. See the full score here for illustration. A physical cue for the Orchestra Piano player at m. A: mm.
BU vs. There are no approximations, miscalculations, or missteps in his computations. Additionally, the music in the BU is dynamic, changing in intensity with the changes of mood and character in the OU e. The following conclusion is therefore incontrovertible and must be addressed:.
The location of the BU should allow two conductors to maintain visual contact throughout the movement. However, the proportion ratios in the two charts provided above are provided at each juncture in the movement, so the related tempos betweeen the two ensembles may be easily derived regardless of whether the OU is following the BU or more likely the BU is following the OU. The measures and their Roman numerals are:. Ives intended the tempo ratios between the OU and BU in the fourth movement to obtain throughout. In either case, the indicated proportions in the full score must obtain, and two conductors working in tandem are therefore indispensable.
Ives originally scored this movement to begin with the present measure 1, with the BU and the Contrabasses playing together from the start. Ives then changed his mind, and decided that the BU percussion could optionally play its seven measure cycle alone at the beginning of the movement, without the Basses, followed by a repetition of the entire percussion with the Basses. Ives made no provision for how the measures should be renumbered to account for this.
Therefore, this edition designates the opening solo percussion pattern as optional measures A through G. The Percussion cycle is seven measures long, except for the Snare Drum: its cycle is a half rest longer than the cycles of the other instruments. If the BU is to follow the OU a more reasonable interpretive decision, given the romantic nature of the music of the OU, which lends itself to agogic phrasing , then the following proportions would be used by the BU in the rondo:. The metrical shift from duple time to compound time seems merely a notational shorthand.
The most likely reading is t. If resolving this is important for the conductor, the Alternate Snare Drum Part is a tenable solution. Dynamic Swell in the BU The initial crescendo swell in the BU in the fourth movement is apparently desired for the entire movement evidence for this is found in the oblong MS score.
Care must be taken to attenuate the dynamics, however. In many cases, the forte f midpoint of the BU cycle matches structural high points in the music of the OU where its music is loud. In other cases, the forte midpoint of the BU works against the character of the OU music where it is soft. It is likely that Ives did not consider these occasional clashes of character, and so the conductor might instruct the BU to reduce its dynamic swell according to the nature of the OU music on a passage-bypassage basis. Notice that in m.
The Celesta may optionally double the melody here. If that note is played by the Piano, it should not be played by the Celesta. Tempo Malfunction in the Comedy, m. This apparently represents the initial acceleration of the locomotive in the Celestial Railroad program, climaxing with the train whistles in the winds at mm. However, the dyssynchrony extends over the latter seven measures of the passage. The seven measures from mm. The arrival point for MM stated by Ives is either at the beginning of m. This is computed assuming a constant, even addition of 2.
The remaining eight quarter beats mm. Counting from the downbeat of m. In real terms, this simply means:. It woud be helpful to clarify this interaction for the two players and ensure that the passage is executed correctly. It is therefore worthwhile to examine this section in terms of the mathematics of the accelerando of the Upper Orchestra and where it should logically arrive.
From this we may draw conclusions about what liberties the conductor has for executing the passage a piacere as well as strictly, i. From mm. But then, starting at m. There is an indication for the Upper Orchestra at m. The graphics of the score are intentionally set to align the two groups at that point for that reason. For the maximum duration, a deceleration from to 96 spread evenly across 12 quarter notes requires a reduction of 2. This will run 6. For the minimum duration, a deceleration from to spread evenly across 12 quarter notes requires a reduction of.
Therefore, the three bars performed by the decelerating Main Orchestra will run between 6. Again, mathematics omitted here for brevity. If it happens later than m. The important thing, again, is that the result is musical. It would seem best only for the last two measures of the Lower Orchestra to sound i. In mm. But what does this means for an interpretation and execution of the passage? This makes star-shaped asterisks an ideal glyph for original editorial comments throughout the full score.
It is therefore important to keep this in mind when comparing the two scores, and especially important to use the Critical Edition only for scholarly reference, not for rehearsal or performance purposes. However, to avoid confusion between rehearsal numbers and measure numbers e. Therefore rehearsal [R12] is at measure 65, etc. Text Instructions in the Parts Orchestral players are accustomed to playing from parts that simply contain music notation and the traditional terms of musical expression and tempo designations.
BORN: 1770 / DIED: 1827 / NATIONALITY: German
This symphony is so complex that there is a healthy amount of text instructions in each part, and the instructions explain the complex notations in the parts and how they should be conceptualized and negotiated. It would therefore be wise to exhort the players to read the text in their parts carefully and consult the conductor with anything that causes any confusion. Pages from the more complicated parts are reproduced in full for the conductor to study in the following section entitled Part Pages That May Require Explanation.
The conductor is likewise encouraged to study that entry in full in anticipation of any questions the players of those parts may have during rehearsals. Final Thoughts Despite its wealth of modernisms, this work by Ives is perhaps the last great romantic symphony. It is the wine of late nineteenth-century American musical culture fermented in an early twentieth-century bottle. All of the devices employed by the composer—some of the most challenging to be found in the symphonic literature—are but means to a great and expressive end.
The individual parts transcend and inform the whole, which is music of humor, profundity, pathos, and humanity. While all of the part pages are designed to be self-explanatory, some of them may still prompt questions from the players. These will be easier for the conductor to answer if the conductor can see the part. What follows are the part pages in question that require special understanding. Each is preceded by a written explanation of the issue or issues on the pages and how the graphics of each page should clarify the problem and its solution.
If Extra Violin II is played on stage, the two Desk 6 players initially play independently of the main orchestra, but then one of them rejoins the main orchestra while the other continues to play independently. This requires a two-page spread in which one player reads from one page and the other player reads from the other page.
As formatted below, Player 2 reads from the left-hand page and Player 1 reads from the right-hand page. Player 2 continues the written pattern. Player 1 is advised to cue Player 2 at that point. A page turn is normally performed by the left-seated player at a Violin II desk, and in this case it would be Player 2. Player 1 should turn the page and cue Player 2 to rejoin the Main Orchestra at the end of the passage:. Viola, Desk 6, Movement II, mm. Player 1 plays with the main orchestra and reads the material in the upper box on the page.
Player 2 acts as the Extra Viola and plays independently of the main orchestra, entering approximately on the third quarter beat of m. Player 1 is instructed to cue Player 2 to stop playing at that point:. The music on pp. But perhaps because of its isolation, Ives considered the possibility of starting with the triplet rhythm at m. Ives may also have thought that a pattern in 2would keep both players in the same meter notice that this is from one of the two 2vs. The Orchestra Piano part contains an appendix on its pp.
However, this version is potentially misleading in its presentation of the triplets beginning at m. Provided below are the principal pages that contain these measures, and then the two alternative notations of the alternate version of the passage. The alternative notations appear in the appendix of the Orchestra Piano part. In other words, the Secondo Piano may take the triplet rhythm of m. It is interesting that the triplet rhythm at m.
Where possible, alternative renotations have been supplied in the parts on secondary staves. That way it will be closer to the tempo indications, rehearsal boxes, measure numbers, and other information relevant both to rehearsals and to performances. While the translation might prove instructive for rhythmic analysis, it is most likely useless for rehearsal and performance. Helping the players learn to play the triplet pattern just after the beat perhaps listening for the Triangle and Snare Drum for a coordination pulse if they are close and audible would be a better solution:.
Most likely this requires no assistance from the conductor, and the initial quarter-note triplet in the alternative notation is a good enough starting point for feeling and executing the intended rhythm of the measures:. Either an assistant conductor or a careful explanation and conducting technique will serve the original notation of the passage:. The rhythmic translation should pose no problem for the player; the original notation is merely a guide to the intent:. Here a Violin part represents the passage for the entire group:. Further proof of this is found in the MS sources to mm.
The conductor may choose to instruct the players to follow the metered realization exactly, or to allow a more freely-styled performance:. These options include the replacement of one instrument by another, the doubling of certain instruments, and, in some cases, the omission of certain lines.
If not, Indian Drum should also be tacet. Violin I parts have instructions on how to divide the material appropriately if the Flute does not play. See the entry in the Survival Guide on its interplay with the Solo Piano. See the entry on pp. Note that Trumpet 5 plays Cornet exclusively in this movement, and Trumpet 6 only plays in movement IV otherwise. Movement IV mm. Unique line. Befriended by a Mr. Everyone leaves the train to take a ferry across the river to the Celestial City, having been spared the arduous foot journey of the pilgrims who, perhaps not surprisingly, have already crossed the river and are being welcomed into the pearly gates.
Upon boarding the ferry, the narrator discovers that Mr. Smooth-it-away is no longer with him but is back on the shore, having reverted to his true demonic form. Subsequent quotations typically set the tune against a cacophonous orchestral backdrop, perhaps suggesting the jeering of the unsympathetic train passengers. The syrupy Violin melody at m. Charles E. Ives First Time. Ives is an American, born in Connecticut, and educated at Yale.
He studied with Horatio Parker, but an extremely individual manner of musical thought was evident even in the student fugues and sonatas of that period. This is particularly the sense of the prelude. The three succeeding movements are the diverse answers in which existence replies. One word should be spoken here of the peculiar place hymn tunes held in the consciousness of the old New Englanders of the country and the smaller towns. Religion was the only emotional outlet of these earlier Puritans, and hymns the only expression in art medium.
All of the repressed humanity of those rock bound souls was poured into fervent renditions of them. The texture of this symphony is threaded through with strands based on old hymns—not quotations from them, but thematic material derived from them. Most auditors will be surprised to discover that many of the hymn tunes are in a pentatonic scale fourth and seventh either omitted or used sparingly on weaker accents.
This characteristic makes it quite natural to interweave them, and is at the same time productive of atonal aspects of the musical development. The prelude is brief, and its brooding introspective measures have a searching wistful quality. An examination of his unpublished scores reveals a gradual evolution with no sharp transitions. Some of the larger works written many years ago employed polytonal and atonal devices, with quarter tone experiments and harmonic developments which precede in point of time the innovations of the extreme modernists.
It is actually far more logical than Schoenberg, and equally uncompromising. Almost it would seem that the New England spirit of the forefathers has come incredibly into an adequate artistic expression. This symphony, the fourth, was written for the most part in and completed about ten years ago. The aesthetic program of the work is that of many of the greatest literary and musical masterpieces of the world—the searching questions of What? Most of the program note would appear to have been written or dictated by Ives. Bellamann may have been solely responsible for paragraphs 1, 2, 11, 12, 15, and 16 though still based on thoughts from Ives.
It is scored for strings, voices, trumpet, celesta, piano with a distant choir of harp and muted strings. The Fugue, omitted in this performance, is an expression of the reaction of life into formalism and ritualism. These are not meant to be heard separately. The blend of the cross rhythms, of long and short rhythmic curves, promotes the intricate and exciting movement.
These rhythmic clashes and contradictions are in the nature of rhythmic dissonance, if a phrase may be coined to describe them. Basically there is a rhythm marked by gongs, and deeper metallic timbres. Above that the drums, then smaller drums, and an Indian drum. Above these the wood wind is used rather as percussion—brass similarly. There is notable absence from the score of the lyrical voices of oboe and French horn. The solo piano plays the role of leader. The use of long groups of seven, eleven, and thirteen in the last movement as rhythmical units without intramensural accents may be noticed.
In nearly all of these cross rhythms the parts begin on unaccented beats. Sometimes these units coincide on the initial beats, more often they have only a paragraphic coincidence. This is music of hard bone and tough sinew. It is bound into technical unity by the most extraordinary mastery of material that is often crabbed and fractious. This expression of Dionysian frenzy, written, it must be remembered, some years ago, is a curiously apposite portrayal of contemporary mental and moral excitement. The succeeding movement, the one being played at this concert, is not a scherzo in any accepted sense of the word; but it is a comedy.
The dream, or fantasy, ends with an interruption of reality—the Fourth of July in Concord—brass bands, drum corps, etc. Here are old popular tunes, war songs, and the like. There is a. This strongly suggests that Ives drafted or ghost-wrote most of the note for Bellamann. Ives was distributed as an insert to the following issue vol. Unfortunately, through numerous oversights, those notes did not correlate to all of the asterisks that Ives had placed in the printed score. In addition, in his manuscripts Ives gives other important information about the performance of this music. Sinclair, Thomas M.
The letters in a circle over some of the parts indicate the degree of prominence [proximity] these may take. It does not seem advisable to use Saxophone throughout no source indicates a Saxophone substitution for mm. There are passages where a Bassoon would handle the soft dynamic marking much better e. It is better not to have the Orchestra Piano[s] in the front of the orchestra nor next to the Solo Piano.
It is to be played] slowly, in major thirds, falling through wholetones. The number of the Trumpets depends to a certain extent upon the size of the orchestra. At least three are required; at Sec. It is assumed that the Low and High Bells present a continuous scale and of like quality. It is preferable to have no double-stopping here. Throughout the movement there is little double-stopping indicated.
The players may use it at their discretion, to better bring out the accent and rhythm, especially if the string orchestra is not large. Only the lower Violin II goes up to D natural, others hold their notes. If there are [only] a few Basses, some of the Cellos may play with them [8va]. Both groups may keep in the time relation indicated on this page, but at the beginning of the next page [m. Care must be taken that the lower orchestra in no way increases its tempo or intensity through here.
After the upper orchestra has stopped, the lower must sound quietly on as if it had been oblivious of the disturbance. During this passage it may be advisable to have one of the players in the upper orchestra act as a separate conductor. Orchestra] in this passage which may extend into Sec. If so, one of their number acting as leader for these few measures will simplify the playing. If the instruments here could be grouped and placed apart from each other and at varying distances from the audience, the rhythms would better stand out in their perspective.
Upper part lighter than lower. To maintain the pattern, the Timpani and Gong should each play their ossias. There may be a slight ritardando as well as a decrescendo [of the Main.
The Brass may be omitted from here to the measure before Sec. Distribute the doublestopping according to the number of strings. Accents show shifted phrasing not to be played heavily. Dr staves—provided in Sn. Dr part as a coordination cue]. Probably Mr. Part of the Violins can play up high to get a kind of harmonic cluster, heard just faintly. A realization of this is provided in the part.
This part should be scarcely audible. In Secs. If very fast, the groups of three notes may be rolled as one chord just after each beat. The last chord in all parts, except those playing at Sec. In this and similar places, what is wanted, in a way, is the suggestion of the feeling one may. It has been asked if the radio might not help in this matter. It has little of the ethereal quality. It is but a photographing process which seems only to hand over the foreground or parts of it in a clump. The writer remembers hearing, when a boy, the music of a band in which the players were arranged in two or three groups around the town square.
The main group in the bandstand at the center usually played the main themes, while the others, from the neighboring roofs and verandas, played the variations, refrains, etc. The bandmaster told of a man who, living nearer the variations, insisted that they were the real music and it was more beautiful to hear the hymn come sifting through them than the other way around.
The writer remembers, as a deep impression, the echo parts from the roofs played by a chorus of violins and voices. The above suggests something in the way of listening that may have a bearing on the interpretation of certain kinds of music. In the illustration above, the listener may choose which of these two rhythms he wishes to hold in his mind as primal. As the eye, in looking at a view, may focus on the sky, clouds or distant outlines, yet sense the color and form of the foreground, and then, by bringing the eye to the foreground, sense the distant outlines and color, so, in some similar way can the listener choose to arrange in his mind the relation of the rhythmic, harmonic and other material.
Some method similar to that of the enclosed parts of a pipe organ played by the choir or swell manuals might be adopted in some way for an orchestra. That similar plans, as suggested, have been tried by conductors and musicians is quite certain, but the writer knows only of the ways mentioned in the instances above.
When one tries to use an analogy between the arts as an illustration, especially of some technical matter, he is liable to get in wrong. But the general aim of the plans under discussion is to bring various parts of the music to the ear in their relation, as the perspective of a picture brings to the eye. As the distant hills, in a landscape, row upon row, grow gradually into the horizon, so there may be something corresponding to this in the presentation of music. Music seems too often all foreground even if played by a master of dynamics.
The cost of trial rehearsals, duplicate players, locations or halls suitably arranged and acoustically favorable, is very high nowadays. The plan will seem to some little more than another way of increasing the already heavy burdens of conductors, orchestras and their management. The writer has but taken the opportunity to get some things out of his system that have been there for some time; whether the process will help or not help music presentation is another matter.
The matter of placement is only one of the many things which, if properly examined, might strengthen the means and functions of interpretation, etc. The means to examine seem more lacking than the will to examine. Money may travel faster than sound in some directions— but not in the direction of musical experimentation or extension. Most of the research and other work of extending and distributing the premises, either by the presentation of new works or any other ways, has been done by societies and individuals against trying obstacles.
The same may be said of individual workers,—writers, lecturers and artists who take upon themselves unremunerative subjects and. America is yet too young, perhaps, to take this point of view; possibly the attitude of American governments toward music is one inherent in democracy. It may be better to trust the people and the individual. They, after enough opportunity to examine the premises and so get at the underlying facts, whether in a fundamental matter of music or of economics, may work out their own problems better than statesmanesque politicians can for them.
Conductors, players, and composers, as a rule, do the best they can and for that reason get more out of music and, incidentally, more out of life—though, perhaps, not more in their pockets. The hope of all music—of the future, of the past, to say nothing of the present—will not lie with the partialist who raves about an ultra-modern opera if there is such a thing , but despises Schubert, or with the party man who viciously takes the opposite assumption. Nor will it lie in any cult or any idiom or in any artist or any composer. All music is from heaven.
If there is anything bad in it, I put it there—by my implications and limitations. Nature builds the mountains and meadows and man puts in the fences and labels. Hans Barth, pianist, composer, and inventor, whose Concerto for Quarter-Tone Piano and Strings was premiered in the year after the New Music publication [of the Comedy movement] by Leopold Stokowski with the Philadelphia Orchestra. Katherine Bellamann, wife of Henry Bellamann [author or co-author? This is understandable, because the thicket of ideas presented by Ives is not helped by his free-associative manner of writing, which is otherwise wonderful in its mercurial style.
Conventionally, the prominence indicators have been interpreted as sigla that rate the importance of the various threads of the orchestral fabric, much like the Hauptstimme and Nebenstimme symbols of Schoenberg. Instrumental parts with the same prominence letter in the same passage do not necessarily share the same material. This contradicts an interpretation linking prominence with musical content.
Whither prominence? The cause for misinterpretation is in large part semantic. In his Memos Ives writes on the Fourth Symphony: Technically, an important matter that has to do with the playing of this symphony, especially the second and fourth movements, is that of varying degrees of the intensities of various parts or groups. In this connection, a distribution of instruments. Ives has therefore established a direct connection between prominence and physical proximity. Here Ives points out that our apprehension of the absolute volume of sound is constant even when our distance from the source of the sound varies.
For example, the quantity of volume that is received from a trumpet playing f across the street may not be great, but the quality of the sound makes it apparent to us that the trumpet is in fact playing f. But does this mean that the symphony should only be performed with a novel seating arrangement of the players? Ives responds:. Or does the fault lie in poor orchestration? Ives apparently considered these problems and answered them in his entry on the Fourth Symphony in the Memos:.
This passage is an illustration of a matter discussed in the footnote. Varying the distances would indeed clarify this passage. During conventional performances, each successive entrance wipes out the previous one, so that when all of the triplet patterns are sounding, then typically only the topmost one is heard clearly.
Symphony No 5 (Giroux)
Distance might in fact set the three rhythms in relief. Notice that Stone overlooks the seventh prominence level, G. Perhaps because the instruments are playing onstage with. In the performance score pp. Therefore, they will simply follow the main conductor using the principal notation provided in the full score and parts.
And so it goes for the entire symphony, which is a celebration of melodies: certain lines must stand out in each passage, else the music risks becoming an inpenetrable thicket of sound lacking anything for the listener to hang his or her hat on. Phrasing is key to an engaging performance of Ives; his attention to tempos and temporal transitions alone attest to its necessity.
As such, an agogic extension of certain measures will help convey the alternately intriguing and beautiful sounds that they contain. What follows is therefore a listing of elements in the score that may require special interpretative or rehearsal attention or both, as the case may be. It may be worthwhile, therefore, to instruct the Clarinets to play the triplets and trills soft enough so that they themselves hear the Flutes and Piccolo through m. Bringing out the dynamics of the Clarinets, Trumpet, Trombone, and Violin II to emphasize their tune—a principal theme in the composition of the movement—seems a stronger interpretive choice.
The a k4 in the Solo Piano in m. Thus, it might be wise to have the 2nd Flute player or the sadly underutilized 3rd Flute player, who only plays for 4 brief measures in the Finale play it in its sounding octave and have the Piccolo remain tacet until m. Ensure that the D. Also, notice that Trumpet III is optionally 8va in mm.
This will need to be determined by the principal conductor, and is a function of his or her interpretation of the score. To assist the conductor in this process, below is a listing of the most obvious locations where an assistant conductor might be employed or certainly must be employed :. Especially helpful to the D. The same conductor might be useful for helping the D. Ensuring that the D.
Therefore, the onstage assistant conductor might conduct the D. The Orchestra Piano part contains notation showing the resulting, true pitches of the Quarter-tone Piano, and some players may incorrectly conclude that the realization shown in the Orchestra Piano part is what is to be played on the Scordatura instrument, which is not the case. However, if the Indian Drum player of the 2nd movement is playing with the B.
Brahms' Piano Works. Buxtehude's Organ Works. Franz Liszt. Handel's Organ Concertos. Handel: Aylesford Pieces. Haydn Piano sonatas. Haydn's String Quartets Opus Johann Kuhnau: Uns ist ein Kind geboren. Messiah, HWV Pachelbel's Organ Works. Romanian Folk Dances. Schubert's Piano Works. Schumann's Piano Works. Sor - Six divertissements pour la guitare Opus 1. Sor - Six divertissements pour la guitare Opus 2. Tchaikovsky's Orchestra Works - I. The Gimo Music Collection. The Lancer's Quadrilles. The Virtuoso Pianist. Similar items.
Listen Details. Email not valid.